The genomic alterations in glioblastoma influence the levels of CSF metabolites

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is underutilized in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), partly due to a lack of studies demonstrating the clinical utility of CSF biomarkers. While some studies show the utility of CSF cell-free DNA analysis, studies analyzing CSF metabolites in patients with glioblastoma are limited. Diffuse gliomas have altered cellular metabolism. For example, mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase enzymes (e.g., IDH1 and IDH2) are common in diffuse gliomas and lead to increased levels of D-2-hydroxyglutarate in CSF. However, there is a poor understanding of changes CSF metabolites in GBM patients. In this study, we performed targeted metabolomic analysis of CSF from n = 31 patients with GBM and n = 13 individuals with non-neoplastic conditions (controls), by mass spectrometry. Hierarchical clustering and sparse partial least square-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) revealed differences in CSF metabolites between GBM and control CSF, including metabolites associated with fatty acid oxidation and the gut microbiome (i.e., carnitine, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine, shikimate, aminobutanal, uridine, N-acetylputrescine, and farnesyl diphosphate). In addition, we identified differences in CSF metabolites in GBM patients based on the presence/absence of TP53 or PTEN mutations, consistent with the idea that different mutations have different effects on tumor metabolism. In summary, our results increase the understanding of CSF metabolites in patients with diffuse gliomas and highlight several metabolites that could be informative biomarkers in patients with GBM. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40478-024-01722-1.


Introduction
Glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with poor prognosis and limited treatment options.A major challenge in the treatment of patients with GBM is the lack of reliable, non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for early detection, monitoring, and therapy selection.Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is in direct contact with the central nervous system (CNS) and CSF metabolites have the potential to reflect the metabolic alterations associated with tumor presence and progression [42,46].Analysis of CSF metabolites is less invasive than tissue biopsy and allows for serial collection at different timepoints over the course of disease.Yet, CSF biomarkers remain underutilized in patients with GBM and have not yet been incorporated into routine clinical practice due to technical challenges and the need for more studies to understand CSF metabolic changes.
Metabolomic analysis has revealed differences in metabolites between viable tumor, necrotic regions, and non-neoplastic regions in GBM tissue samples [12,18].Several studies have explored differences in plasma metabolites between GBM patients and controls [1,14,33,38].Machine learning analysis has also demonstrated changes in blood metabolites before surgery, after surgery, and following chemo-radiation in GBM patients [1].Another study identified seven plasma molecules, associated with energy metabolism and signaling pathways catalyzing tumor proliferation and invasion, to be biomarkers that are elevated in GBM patients [14].
Although studies of CSF metabolites from GBM patients are limited, metabolomic analysis of CSF has shown promise in the characterization of CNS tumors.For example, differences in CSF metabolites between high-grade gliomas and healthy controls have been identified [34,46].Moreover, we have previously identified differences in CSF biomarkers in patients with diffuse gliomas based on IDH1 mutation status, and in the CSF of patients with different types of CNS germ cell tumors [2,17,52].Also, analysis of metabolites in CSF has been shown to predict malignant transformation and leptomeningeal metastasis in glioma patients [22].
In addition to the studies above, associating changes in CSF metabolites to brain tumors, studies suggest that gut microbiome-derived metabolites can influence the blood brain barrier [43,50,59].Imbalances in the relative abundance of gut microbes (dysbiosis) can lead to disease in the CNS [3].Studies have found differences in the gut microbiome of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) versus healthy controls [10,41].In addition, gut dysbiosis have been described in the setting of brain tumors [13,32].In particular, alterations in gut levels of Akkermansia sp. have been associated with the presence of gliomas in humans and mice models, and metabolites of bacterial origin have been associated with neurotoxicity [41,44].
In this study, we explored the metabolic profile of CSF in patients with GBM and investigated the correlation between CSF metabolites and genomic alterations.Our objective was to identify metabolic signatures in CSF that are associated with tumor presence, and to understand how these metabolites could serve as biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of GBM patients.

CSF processing
CSF samples were processed within 3 h of collection and centrifuged twice at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C.The cell pellet was discarded, and the supernatant was immediately stored at -80 °C until the time of analysis.100 µL of each CSF sample were used for metabolomics analysis.CSF via lumbar puncture was collected utilizing the adult LP tray (Cat.4306 C, CareFusion, IL, USA).

Targeted metabolomics
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) Single Reaction Monitoring (SRM) was used to characterize metabolites in CSF.Metabolites were measured using three different chromatographic methods.For each method, metabolites were normalized against the spiked internal standards and the data were log2-transformed (see Sup. Material 6 for details).

Statistical analysis
The relative abundance of 125 metabolites was measured as part of a targeted metabolite profiling analysis.The resulting counts were normalized to an internal standard and log2-transformed.The data were additionally z-transformed for each metabolite across all samples for heatmap generation.Welch's t-test was used for comparisons of metabolite levels between two groups.Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn's test for multiple comparisons was used for comparisons of metabolite levels between 3 groups.All analyses were performed using Python 3.8 and R Statistical Software (v4.2.2; R Core Team 2021).Significance calculations were performed using the Python library scikit-learn [45].The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Bioinformatics next-generation clustered heat map (NGCHM) software in R was used to generate heatmaps [6].Sparse partial least squares-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) plots were generated using the mixOmics R toolkit [47].Boxplots were generated using the R package ggpubr [28] and volcano plots using Matplotlib [21] in Python.Kaplan-Meier plots were generated using the kaplanmeier Python library [53], and cutoff values for determining high and low groups were found using the function get.cutoff() from the CutoffFinder R file [7].

Mutation analysis
A subset of matched tumor samples was analyzed for genomic alterations by a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel interrogating 205 cancer-related genes for mutations and 26 genes for rearrangements (FoundationOne; Foundation Medicine, Inc.).This information was obtained from the patient's electronical medical record.

Patients and CSF samples
This study included CSF from 31 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM), 23 men and 8 women, ranging in age from 18 to 76 years.Thirteen (13) patients had CSF samples collected pre-treatment, while 18 patients had CSF samples collected post-treatment (Fig. 1A, 1B).Somatic mutation analysis of tumor tissue was only available for the 18 patients with post-treatment CSF samples (Fig. 1B).In addition, CSF from 13 patients, (4 male and 9 female), ranging in age from 25 to 77 years, with nonneoplastic CNS diseases (i.e., hydrocephalus, stroke, aqueduct stenosis, migraine, arachnoid cyst, colloid cyst, and trauma) was used as control (Fig. 1A).The survival and event timeline of GBM patients in the study are illustrated in Sup.Material 1.

Differences in metabolites between pre-treatment GBM and post-treatment GBM samples
125 metabolites were identified in CSF as part of the targeted metabolic analysis.Statistical comparisons of metabolite levels were performed between GBM pretreatment (GBM pre-tx) and control patients, as well as between GBM pre-treatment and post-treatment samples.sPLS-DA demonstrated differences between pre-treatment and control, as well as between pre-treatment and post-treatment GBM CSF samples (Fig. 2A), (Fig. 2B).Therefore, pre-and post-treatment CSF samples were analyzed separately.

Differences in CSF metabolites based on sex
There is a difference in the proportion of male and female patients between the pre-and post-treatment GBM cohorts, with a near-even split (46% female) in the pretreatment cohort and disproportionately more male patients (11% female) in the post-treatment cohort.To confirm that the metabolic differences between pre-and post-treatment CSF samples are not due to differences in the proportion of female patients, we performed significance and fold change calculations on the GBM cohort based on sex.We identified a small number of metabolites (2-methylbutyrylcarnitine, methyl methoxyacetate, 2-hydroxyglutarate, cytosine, cholesterol sulfate, methylparaben) that are present at different levels between male and female patients in the GBM cohort (pre-and post-treatment samples) (Sup.Material 2A).Similarly, we identified a small number of metabolites (2-methylbutyrylcarnitine, 2-hydroxyglutarate, allantoin, glycine) that are different between male and female patients in the pre-treatment GBM cohort (Sup.Material 2B).To exclude variability due to patient's sex, we compared pretreatment and post-treatment CSF from male patients only, and we identified several metabolites that are significantly different between male pre-and post-treatment GBM CSF (3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaric acid, stearic acid, uridine, spaglumic acid, hydroxyisocaproic acid, myristoleic acid, methyl hippurate, aminobutanal, alanine, kynurenine, s-ribosyl-L-homocysteine, alpha-ketoglutarate) (Sup.Material 2C).Therefore, the differences in CSF metabolites between pre-treatment and post-treatment GBM samples are not due only to sex.

Differences in metabolites between pre-treatment GBM and control CSF samples
sPLS-DA demonstrated differences in CSF metabolites between GBM (pre-treatment) and control samples (Fig. 2C).Supervised hierarchical clustering based on the squared Euclidean distance (Ward's method) revealed differences in overall metabolite abundance between GBM pre-tx and controls (Fig. 2D).Volcano plots illustrated fold-change and probability values for each 3, log2(GBM/Control) > + 1 or < -1) between GBM and control CSF samples.Seven metabolites are present at significantly higher levels in the CSF of GBM patients identified metabolite and highlighted differentially abundant metabolites.Several metabolites showed statistically significantly different levels between GBM pre-tx and control CSF (Fig. 2E).In particular, carnitine, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine, shikimate, aminobutanal, uridine, N-acetylputrescine, and farnesyl diphosphate were present at significantly higher levels in the CSF of GBM pretx patients compared to controls (Fig. 3).

Correlation between CSF metabolite levels and somatic mutations in GBM
Somatic mutation analysis of tumor tissue was available for the 18 GBM patients with CSF collected post-treatment (Fig. 1B).The most common mutations identified were TERT promoter (TERTp), CDKN2A/B, NF1, PTEN, TP53, and EGFR.Global analysis of metabolites shows a statistically significant difference in CSF metabolite levels between patients with TP53-wildtype and TP53-mutant GBM (Fig. 4), as well as PTEN-mutant and PTEN-wildtype GBM (Fig. 5).Only minor significant differences in metabolites were identified according to TERTp, CDKN2A/B, NF1 or EGFR mutation status.
Analysis of the levels of carnitine compounds revealed lower levels of these metabolites (i.e., carnitine, propionylcarnitine, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine, isobutyryl-Lcarnitine, and deoxycarnitine) in CSF from patients with TP53-mutant versus TP53-wildtype GBM (Fig. 6).When compared to the control CSF, TP53-mutant samples did not show significantly different levels for four of the five carnitine compounds (exception: 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine). In contrast, the level of all carnitine compounds in the CSF from patients with TP53-wildtype GBM was significantly higher across the board, compared to that in CSF from control patients or TP53-mutant GBM patients (Fig. 6).
We next analyzed the levels of clinically-relevant metabolites that are routinely measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in patients with GBM, including lactate, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and choline.The data showed significantly lower levels of lactate, GABA and choline in CSF from patients with TP53mutant GBM compared to TP53-wildtype.The data also showed higher levels of lactate, GABA, and choline in the CSF of patients with PTEN-mutant GBM compared to PTEN-wildtype GBM (Fig. 7).

Correlation between CSF metabolites and survival in patients with GBM
We analyzed the correlation between metabolite levels in CSF and overall survival (OS) for the 9 pre-treatment GBM samples (Sup.Material 4).To evaluate if metabolites levels correlate with overall survival, we separated patients into "high" or "low" groups for each metabolite based on the cutoff value calculated from CutoffFinder's fit of mixture model [7].Kaplan-Meier plots were generated for each metabolite.OS was compared between patients with "high" or "low" levels for each of the 125 metabolites measured in the study.Three metabolites  showed a statistically significant association with OS in patients with GBM (2-methylbutyrylcarnitine, aminobutanal, and acetylcholine) (Fig. 8).

Metabolites and age
We performed a linear regression analysis between age and metabolite levels, for each metabolite, for the entire cohort of glioblastoma samples (pre-and post-treatment) and no significant correlation was observed (R^2 value ranged from 0.15 to 0.000055).We performed the same analysis with the pre-treatment samples and did not observe a significant correlation between age and metabolite levels for any of the metabolites analyzed (R^2 value ranged from 0.52 to 8.12E-07).We also performed the same analysis with the post-treatment cohort and did not observe a significant correlation between age and metabolite levels for any of the metabolites analyzed (R^2 value ranged from 0.30 to 1.76E-06).

Discussion
Our results in this study and previous studies demonstrate differences in CSF metabolites between patients with diffuse gliomas and individuals without brain cancer [2,22,34].Differences in levels of CSF metabolites may be due to the metabolic activity of cancer cells and/ or the effect of tumor cells on overall brain activity [40,42].In this study, we found several metabolites that are present at significantly different levels in CSF of patients with GBM compared to controls.The data also show that GBM mutations may influence the levels of metabolites in CSF, including metabolites that are routinely analyzed by MRS with advanced brain MRI scans.Moreover, our current and previous data show that a metabolite considered to be of bacterial origin is significantly altered in the CSF of patients with GBM [2].

Carnitine association between GBM and lipid metabolism
Carnitine and 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine were found to be present at significantly higher levels in the CSF of GBM patients compared to controls (Fig. 3A, 3B).GBM cells have been shown to exhibit elevated levels of carnitine [15], and although this was found in our study, it is unclear what role the GBM size, GBM location, and other factors may play.Carnitine and acyl-carnitines are crucial components of the carnitine shuttle system (CSS), which facilitates the transport of fatty acids into the mitochondria for fatty acid oxidation (FAO) (Sup.Material 3A) [8,20,35].Recent studies have implicated FAO as an important energy production pathway in GBM as well as a key mediator of GBM plasticity and adaptability [26, ].An increase in the CSF levels of carnitine found in this study may indicate increased reliance on lipid metabolism in GBM.Organic cation transporter OCTN2 (SLC22A5) is the primary transporter of dietary carnitine throughout the body, and OCTN2 is highly expressed in the brain of GBM patients compared to healthy brains [15,24,29].Consequently, the higher carnitine levels observed in the CSF of the GBM patients evaluated here may be facilitated by upregulation of OCTN2, which in turn could potentially be a response to greater demand for carnitine by enhanced fatty acid oxidation in GBM.

Shikimate levels and the gut microbiome
In our previous study of CSF metabolites, we found an association between higher CSF levels of shikimate and IDH-wildtype gliomas compared to controls [2], a finding recapitulated in Fig. 3C.CSF shikimate levels have also been found to be elevated in patients with autism spectrum disorder [5].Shikimate is an intermediate in the shikimate pathway.This pathway is not present in animals but it is used by plants, bacteria, algae, and other microorganisms in the biosynthesis of aromatic compounds (Sup.Material 3B) [19].While the shikimate pathway is active in some bacteria present in the human gut microbiome, transcriptome analysis shows that most gut bacteria do not possess a complete shikimate pathway [36].However, computational modeling reveals that the gut bacteria Akkermansia muciniphila expresses all the genes encoding the necessary enzymes in the shikimate pathway and accounts for a significant portion of the gene expression associated with the shikimate pathway in the human gut microbiome.These data suggest that A. muciniphila could be responsible for a significant amount of total shikimate produced by human gut microbiome [36].We have previously identified higher levels of the Akkermansia genus in the gut microbiome of glioma patients and a glioma mouse model, compared to controls [44].Therefore, the elevated CSF levels of shikimate in GBM patients identified in the current study may be influenced by the gut microbiome, in particular Akkermansia sp., suggesting a possible relationship between the gut-brain axis and CSF metabolites.Additionally, recent studies demonstrate unique microbial signatures within cancer types, including GBM [39].To determine the source of the CSF shikimate identified in this study, future studies could determine whether shikimate-producing bacteria are present in human GBM tissue [39].In order to detect remnants of shikimate-producing bacteria in the CSF, metagenomic sequencing could be employed, in a manner similar to but more specific than that used clinically in patients with meningitis or encephalitis [58].

Uridine levels correlate with tumor samples
We found uridine CSF levels to be greater in pre-treatment GBM samples compared to control samples.Uridine is a pyrimidine molecule that is an intermediate in nucleoside synthesis, particularly in the catabolism of L-glutamine to B-alanine (Sup.Material 3C) [62].Consistent with our results, uridine concentration was found to be higher in tissue samples of GBM, IDH-wildtype tumors compared to controls [25].

Tumor mutations influence CSF metabolite levels
Previous studies have demonstrated differences in the levels of metabolites based on genetic alterations in tumors.For example, diffuse gliomas have been shown to exhibit distinct tissue metabolite profiles depending on IDH1 mutation status [55].Moreover, our previous study revealed higher levels of D-2-hydroxyglutarate in the CSF of patients with IDH-mutant gliomas compared to patients with IDH-wildtype gliomas [17].In the current study, we have identified novel differences in CSF metabolites between patients with TP53-mutant and TP53-wildtype GBM.CSF from patients with TP53-wildtype GBM contained higher levels of several metabolites including lactate, GABA, choline, carnitine, and carnitine derivates.In contrast, the levels of lactate, GABA, and choline were increased in the CSF of patients with GBM-PTEN-mutant, compared to GBM-PTEN-wildtype (Fig. 5).

Carnitine and derived compounds are more abundant in CSF from patients with TP53-wildtype GBM
We identified carnitine and carnitine derivatives as key metabolic biomarkers in the CSF of patients with GBM.Carnitine and its acyl derivatives emerged as significant factors in our dataset, with increased abundance in the CSF of GBM patients, particularly those with TP53wildtype status.Carnitine, acylcarnitines 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine, propionylcarnitine, isobutyryl-L-carnitine, and deoxycarnitine were significantly more abundant in TP53-wildtype, compared to TP53-mutant, GBM patients (Fig. 6).In GBM patients, TP53 potentially plays an indirect yet critical role in regulating FAO and may subsequently affect carnitine and acylcarnitine levels in CSF.More specifically, p53-responsive elements have been identified in the first intron of the carnitine palmitoyltransferase IC (CPT1C) gene; studies in cell lines have shown that p53 can regulate CPT1C expression [48].The effects of increased CPT1C expression on tumor progression and FAO activity is well-documented in the literature [11,57,60,63].While the exact mechanism for reduced levels of carnitine compounds in the CSF of patients with TP53-mutant GBM remains to be elucidated, impaired TP53 regulation of CPT1C expression in TP53-mutant GBM may be a contributing factor.When the TP53 mutations occur, FAO is reduced [48], and the tumor cells' ability to use FAO as an alternative energy production pathway might be affected.This may result in a reduced demand for carnitine in TP53-mutant GBM and lower concentrations of carnitine and carnitine derivatives in the CSF.The present findings support this hypothesis, as the relative levels of carnitine, propionylcarnitine, and isobutyryl-L-carnitine were significantly increased in TP53-wildtype GBM but were not significantly different from control patients or patients with TP53-mutant GBM (Fig. 6).

MRS biomarkers for TP53 and PTEN mutation status
The metabolites lactate, GABA, and choline are clinically relevant because they are measured in imaging studies through magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) [56].Some studies show that tumor mutation status can potentially influence MRS results [30].Our results reveal that the levels of these metabolites can be influenced by the mutations present in the tumor (Fig. 7).Lactate, GABA, and choline were present at significantly lower levels in the CSF of TP53-mutant GBM patients when compared to that of TP53-wildtype GBM patients (Fig. 7A and 7C).On the contrary, the relative values of each of the three MRS-measurable metabolites were significantly higher in the CSF of PTEN-mutant GBM patients compared to that of PTEN-wildtype GBM patients (with the exception of lactate, which follows a similar trend) (Fig. 7D and 7F).Absence of p53 has been associated with downregulation of choline levels in human embryonic stem cells [65], suggesting a potential link between choline metabolism and p53.

TP53 and the warburg effect
In addition, TP53 is known to regulate glycolysis and influence the Warburg effect by negatively regulating lactate dehydrogenase [64].Similarly, it has been proposed that mutant TP53 can stimulate the Warburg effect in cultured cells [61].Interestingly, we observed lower lactate levels in the CSF of patients with mutant TP53.The relationship between lower lactate levels in CSF and the predicted effects of mutant TP53 in regulating the Warburg effect is unclear and requires further investigation.Given that the levels of lactate, GABA, and choline levels appear to be influenced by GBM mutations, it may be important to consider tumor mutations when interpreting MRS results.To evaluate this further, it would be necessary to correlate the CSF metabolite findings with MRS imaging and perform receiver-operator curve analysis to detect the sensitivity and specificity of a given cut-off on MRS that reliably predicts TP53 and PTEN mutation status when GBM tissue is not available.

Metabolites associated with sex
Differences between male and female patients with glioblastoma have been described.For example, the incidence of glioblastoma is 1.6 times higher in men than women [51].Also, men have worse OS than women.Although differences in the proportion of MGMT promoter methylation between male and female and female with glioblastoma have been proposed [9], it appears that the difference is not statistically significant [16].In addition, studies have shown differences in the expression of glycolytic genes between males and females, with potential association to overall survival [23].In our analysis, we identified some CSF metabolites that were significantly different between male and patients, consistent with the idea that physiological and hormonal differences associated with sex can influence the levels of metabolites in CSF in patients with GBM.This is important when trying to identify metabolites that can serve as GBM biomarkers, because it might be required to use different cutoffs for males and females, when using a CSF metabolite as biomarker to identify patients with GBM.

Metabolites associated with overall survival
We identified four metabolites that showed a statistically significant association with OS (Fig. 8).Increased levels of 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine and aminobutanal were found to be associated with the presence of GBM, and higher levels were associated with worse OS (Figs. 3B and 3D and 8A and 8B).Aminobutanal is involved in the synthesis of the neurotransmitter GABA [27] and GABA metabolism has been linked to GBM survival [4].Higher levels of acetylcholine in CSF were found to be associated with worse OS (Fig. 8C).Acetylcholine is a well-defined neurotransmitter with a wide variety of roles in the CNS [37].GBM invasion was found to be significantly enhanced in brain regions with activation of acetylcholine receptors, and it has been suggested that acetylcholine autocrine signaling facilitates GBM invasion through brain tissue [54].The same study also found that increased acetylcholine receptor expression in GBM correlated with worse OS.

Limitations
One limitation of this study is that only CSF samples acquired post-treatment have tumor mutation data available for analysis.Another limitation is the small number of female patients in the post-treatment group.Although, the lower proportion of female patients in the post-treatment GBM group is a limitation, comparison of only the male GBM patients before and after treatment showed significant differences in CSF metabolites.This supports the result that there are differences between the pre-and post-treatment GBM samples that are not due to differences in the number of female patients between the groups.Additional studies with a larger number of patients, including CSF samples acquired before therapy, will provide further confirmation for some of our results.Also, how the time between treatment and CSF collection influences the levels of CSF metabolites is unknown.Despite these limitations, the results of this study increase our understanding of CSF metabolites in GBM patients.

Conclusion
This study demonstrates differences in CSF metabolites between GBM patients and controls.In particular, the elevated levels of carnitine and 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine point to the role of lipid metabolism in GBM biology.Moreover, the elevated CSF shikimate levels suggest a potentially novel link between GBM and the gut microbiome.In addition, the findings highlight the influence of tumor mutations on CSF metabolite levels, including those that can be independently assessed with non-invasive magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 CSF metabolites differ between patients with GBM and controls.(A) sPLS-DA plot with the 31 GBM samples shows that GBM samples collected pre-treatment and post-treatment cluster in separate groups.(B) Volcano plot comparing CSF metabolites in CSF from GBM pre-treatment vs. GBM post-treatment.Colored points represent metabolites that are present at significantly different levels and fold change (-log10(p-value) > 1.3, log2(Post/ Pre) > + 1 or < -1) in CSF samples from GBM pre-treatment vs. GBM post-treatment.Several CSF metabolites are present at significantly different levels in GBM pre-treatment compared to GBM post-treatment.P-value and fold change for differentially abundant metabolites are listed in Supplementary Material 5. (C) sPLS-DA plot with the GBM pre-treatment (n = 13) and control (n = 13) CSF samples shows that GBM and control samples cluster in separate groups.(D) Supervised heat map of metabolite levels (n = 125) in CSF samples from patients with GBM (n = 31) and controls (n = 13).GBM patients either had CSF collected pre-treatment (n = 13) or post-treatment (n = 18).(E) Volcano plot comparing CSF metabolites in CSF from GBM vs. controls.Colored points represent metabolites that are present at significantly different levels and fold change (-log10(p-value) > 1.3, log2(GBM/Control) > + 1 or < -1) between GBM and control CSF samples.Seven metabolites are present at significantly higher levels in the CSF of GBM patients

Fig. 3
Fig.3CSF from GBM patients exhibits significantly higher levels of (A) carnitine, (B) 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine, (C) shikimate, (D) aminobutanal, € uridine, (F) N-acetylputrescine, and (G) farnesyl diphosphate than control CSF.Each colored dot represents a patient, small black dot indicates samples that are 1.5 times the interquartile range above the upper quartile or below the lower quartile